Structure Matrix Methods and Applications †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Structure Matrix Methods and Applications. Answer: Introduction: Various academic discipline involving economics, anthropology, sociology, political science, psychology and philosophy impacts an enterprise management. Economics study influences the management to allocate resources in effective way. Anthropology study contributes in several management areas such as-wellness, recruitment process etc. Sociology study aids to assess managerial procedure in various societies. Study of political science influences the enterprises management practices. Psychology study aids the management to understand workers attitude towards work. Philosophy study affects management in maintaining effective governance, open culture etc. The historical background of management reflects that Egyptians and Chinese used specific had long term advisors and planners in managing any work. Sun Tzu planned military strategies by putting emphasis on significance of planning for wining the war. Chanakya Kautiliya also adopted modern management practice by recruiting staff through various interview processes. There are numerous management theories that todays firms use in administering business operations. These theories involves- general administrative theories, scientific management, organizational behavior and quantitative approach. Fayols general administrative theory was dependent on certain principles including- work division, centralization , personnel remuneration etc. In this context, Webers theory was dependent on few principles including- personnel selection, individuals promotionetc. Scientific management theory also termed as Taylorism focuses on improving management efficiency generally productivity of labor. Quan titative approach primarily integrate some numeric and analytical method into management decision making. Organizational behavior includes early advocates, Hawthorne studies, human relations movement and behavioral science theorist. At present day, companys management includes three approaches systems, contingency and process. In fact, current management practice trends also changed from past trends, which involve workforce diversity, innovation etc. There are few factors that influences globalisation such as- political, economic, cultural etc. Baylis, Smith and Owens (2017) opines that both domestic and international culture impacts globalisation. Additionally, regional trade contract also affects globalisation. For instance, Ganong Brothers, a renowned candy producer has made free trade contract with the US for selling their candies. This agreement along with increased cost influenced globalisation. Moreover, cultural differences between US value and alternate value in some instances such as hard work as factor to success, effective time management, loyalty commitment is highly evident from recent facts (Moran, Abramson and Moran 2014). Additionally, experts views on globalisation varied with each other. Anthony view was that globalisation impacts performance of capital market, Ghemawat views that national and economic integration leads to semi- globalisation. Furthermore, different framework of national culture such as Hofsted e and Trompenaar reflects differences in national culture (Doney, Cannon and Mullen 1998). Enterprise Culture and Management Enterprise culture mainly encompasses different values and behaviors, which contributes to unique psychological and social environment of the organization. Under the CEO of IBM, Grestner, the new strategy adopted by IBM was to utilize processes as well as culture for regaining benefit. The problems at IBM regarding changing its culture involves- high cost approach, focusing on product, outmode practice etc. Grestner plays crucial role in bringing about change in culture of this enterprise (Belak . and Milfelner 2012). In fact, this enterprise has ended its liberal policy which motivates remote work and thus employees are now forced back into the office for facilitating collaboration and providing outstanding service to customers. In fact, the dress code of the employees in IBM also changed over the years. Giachetti (2016) found out that, this change in culture might take near about 5 years. Hence, Gerstner will lead huge revolution for bringing about condition and incentive. There ar e mainly seven dimensions of enterprise culture, which involves- stability, innovation, aggressiveness, outcome orientation, Outcome, people and team orientation. Additionally, there are four determinants to enterprise culture that involves- intensity of enterprise culture, organization size and age, workers turnover and intensity to culture. Also four types of culture included in these enterprises are- power culture, role culture, task culture and above all persons culture. However, change in organizational culture has helped to improve the performance of IBM within the last few years. There are mainly six attributes to enterprise structure, which involves- specialization of work, formalization, centralization, chain of command, departmentalization and time of control. Moreover, the change in enterprise structure is influenced by skills as well as abilities of manager, availability of similar task, physical subordinates proximity, sophistication of enterprise information system. Additionally, there are two models of enterprise design, which involves- mechanic and organic structure (Giachetti 2016). In context to this, contingency factors of enterprise design include- technology, environmental uncertainty, structure, size and strategy of firm. There has been huge difference between traditional and contemporary enterprise design. Contemporary enterprise design is boundary less enterprise that involves- empowerment of team, limited command chain and wider span of control. Therefore, as managing new enterprise has been difficult for the management, they strategizes to use networks, collaborate with team, introduce flexibility in workplace and be innovative (Schermerhorn et al. 2014). Conclusion From the above study, it can be concluded the current trends in management style and practice is far better than the past management practices. The above activities highlights that differences in nations culture although influences enterprise, they should continue to adopt new strategy for improving their productivity as well as performance. However, the enterprise culture as well s structure should be designed by the management based on the present economic condition. References Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. eds., 2017.The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press. Belak, J. and Milfelner, B., 2012. Enterprise culture as one of the enterprises key success factors (integral management approach): does the internal and external cultural orientation matter?.Acta Polytechnica Hungarica,9(3), pp.27-44. Doney, P.M., Cannon, J.P. and Mullen, M.R., 1998. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust.Academy of management review,23(3), pp.601-620. Eppinger, S.D. and Browning, T.R., 2012.Design structure matrix methods and applications. MIT press. Giachetti, R.E., 2016.Design of enterprise systems: Theory, architecture, and methods. CRC Press. Moran, R.T., Abramson, N.R. and Moran, S.V., 2014.Managing cultural differences. Routledge. Schermerhorn, J., Davidson, P., Poole, D., Woods, P., Simon, A. and McBarron, E., 2014.Management: Foundations and Applications (2nd Asia-Pacific Edition). John Wiley Sons. Lasserre, P., 2017.Global strategic management. Palgrave.